King Charles’s cancer ‘caught early’, says Rishi Sunak #shorts #news #king

21 comments

1. Countless ordinary people denied cancer diagnosis and treatment because of Sunaks attacks on the NHS and Charles tax dodging …….parasites both!

2. Thats a shame they caught it early

3. All thanks to God that it was caught early. We are praying and trusting God for his perfect healing of King Charles. By the stripes of the blood of Jesus Christ, may KC be made whole with good health in Jesus name, amen.

4. "Everyone", "we're all", you don't speak for anyone you fool

5. Oh shut up sunak. Free Palestine 🇵🇸

6. Who cares.

7. I'm not sad nore do I give my respect to any royal family member…this is how I truly feel block my comment or not…we the people don't care…what about everyone els dieing of cancer?

8. Family😂😂😂😂pedo😮😮

9. Blah blah who cares

10. Everything, and I mean everything, about Sunak is smiply "weak sauce".

11. I wonder if he will have a six month referral for treatment or does he live in a lucky post code

12. Reading these comments, I've realized why they're going to draft every single one of us, send us to die and replace us with the millions of immigrants that know how to respect a budding authoritarian regime such as ours

13. This truly is bad news. This creepy adulterer doesn’t deserve to be saved.

14. If it's not some type of mylastic chances are with his surgery done chemo lots of rest no stress good diet he will come out on top and be the man he was before I know a man who went through this only he wasn't a king but was back on the job 3 months later as perky as ever 😂

15. Says the guy who said just let them croak with CONvid.

16. I do try hard to have sympathy for anyone who becomes seriously ill. But in this instance I am struggling, and I am not that proud of myself.

    It will be the second anniversary of the death of my beloved husband. We were married for 43 years. I was blessed to have someone who cared for me unconditionally for so long. But it makes it no easier to try to live a life without him.

    He had never smoked, and like me, only ever had a glass of champagne (if we could afford it) on Christmas Day, and again if we could afford it, a glass of wine on our birthdays. He was extremely fit, with the only hospital admissions that I can recall was to correct old rugby injuries, and the removal of a brain tumour not long after he retired. He developed diabetes in later years, but prided himself in his management of this. With these exceptions, he was fit, both physically, mentally and intellectually. He was also an extremely kind and decent person. Sure, we argued from time to time, but who doesn’t?

    He began to lose weight, saying it was because he was trying not to snack.

    I realised there was something not right when he wouldn’t eat Christmas lunch, an unheard of event!! So I dragged him to the GP as soon as there was an appointment available in the new year. He was referred to the local hospital, on a ‘fast track’ basis, as our GP knew us well, and was concerned about how unwell he had suddenly started to look.

    For many years in this county a ‘fast track’ referral meant you would be seen within 2-3 days, at the hospital. I was horrified to discover that a ‘fast track referral’ was now 2-4 WEEKS !! During this time my husband’s health was sliding downhill rapidly, complaining of pain in his stomach, and being unable to eat. I was on the phone to the hospital almost daily.

    After almost four weeks of this he became so unwell that I had to call for an ambulance one night. I couldn’t go with him as it was just after Covid, and rules were still in place about who could be at the hospital. Having waited around 5-6 hours in an ambulance he was admitted.

    By lunchtime the next day I was called to the hospital, as they had run the tests he was waiting for. I was told that my dear, dear husband had “progressed aggressive pancreatic cancer”. There was no treatment, no means of extending his life.

    I am under no illusion that had the old regime of only having to wait a matter of days rather than weeks, my husband would not have been cured. But what I cannot help wondering is whether his time may have been extended as he would not have been quite so ill and weak when a diagnosis was made.

    But one thing I am sure of, is that if the diagnosis had come earlier we would have had a little more time to adjust, to make decisions more clearly, and to make our time more special. But the reality was that from diagnosis to my husband dying was exactly 25 days!! Which in truth, was just a blink of an eye against 43 years of marriage.

    So I try never to wish ill on anyone, but why should one person be treated so very differently to another, simply because of an accident of birth? I was lucky in many ways, having spent so long with this amazing man. But what about the young people, who have young children, when they are diagnosed? Should we not feel even more sympathy for such people, as they have the added layer of heartache knowing they’re leaving their little ones to the fate of life?What about those who know their babies and children will not survive, or their parents don’t know If they will? Are they not more worthy of our concern, sympathy and public resources to dos what is possible to help them fight such awful illnesses, or make their time together as special as possible?

    I don’t like wishing ill on anyone as I’ve said. But my sympathy would be far greater if Charles and his family did more, like using some of their wealth to improve health provision for everyone. Not just accept that they’re entitled to such privilege because of whom they happen to have been born to. This is wrong, as is the mentality of our government who have put health provision for us all far lower down the list of their priorities.

    Thank you.

    Teresa.

17. Sunak out more like 😂

18. No one cares

19. Please stop speaking for everyone! Most of us no longer care! We know to much about that evil lot.

20. He never sounds sincere ,

21. How many are in front of him waiting for treatment?