Penny Mordaunt accuses Labour of doing ‘damage’ to house speaker



Penny Mordaunt accuses Labour of doing ‘damage’ to house speaker

Two significant things happened yesterday and I’m not sure all honorable members have clocked firstly it fell to the government benches to defend the rights of a minority party in this house if the honorable lady opposite cannot bring herself to reflect on the appalling consequences of her party’s actions yesterday if she cannot

Rise above the narrow and immediate needs of her weak and fickle leader to fulfill her duties to this house as its shadow leader perhaps she might like to reflect on the damage her party has done to the office of the speaker I would never have done to him

What the labor party have done to him yeah secondly we have seen Into the Heart of Labor’s leadership nothing is more important than the interests of the labor party the labor party before principle the labor party before individual rights the labor party before the reputation and

Honor of the decent man that sits in speaker’s chair [Applause] yeah

Penny Mordaunt said the Labour party had ‘done damage’ to the office of the speaker as more than 50 MPs signed a motion of no confidence in Sir Lindsay Hoyle.

Mordaunt said it had fallen to the government to defend the rights of the Scottish National Party and added that the Labour party should reflect on the damage it had done to the office of the speaker.

Dozens of lawmakers stormed out of Britain’s parliament on Wednesday with tempers flaring as the three biggest political parties sought to outmanoeuvre each other over a vote on a ceasefire in Gaza. The uproar followed a decision by the speaker to ignore precedent and allow a vote which helped the opposition Labour Party avoid a large-scale rebellion among its own lawmakers over its position on the Israel-Hamas war

Subscribe to Guardian News on YouTube ► http://bit.ly/guardianwiressub

The Guardian publishes independent journalism, made possible by supporters. Contribute to The Guardian today ► https://bit.ly/3uhA7zg

Sign up to the Guardian’s free new daily newsletter, First Edition ► http://theguardian.com/first-edition

Website ► https://www.theguardian.com
Facebook ►https://www.facebook.com/theguardian
Twitter ► https://twitter.com/guardian
Instagram ► https://instagram.com/guardian

The Guardian on YouTube:
The Guardian ► https://bit.ly/guardiannewssubs
Guardian Australia ► https://bit.ly/guardianaussubs
Guardian Football ► https://bit.ly/gdnfootballsubs
Guardian Sport ► https://bit.ly/gdnsportsubs
Guardian Live ► https://bit.ly/guardianlivesubs

#News #UK #SNP #Gaza #Labour #Tories

33 comments
  1. The SNP "leader" is a travesty. He pretends to care about what is happening in Gaza. But really he was just trying to use murdered children as a method of attacking Labour. He wanted to cause division in the Labour Party with this vote. That's why he sent letters to Labour MPs but not to Conservative MPs or Lib Dems. If it had really been about Gaza he would have written to ALL MPs, wouldn't he? It's notable that the SNP actually got what they wanted yesterday. The Labour motion to call for a ceasefire was unanimously carried – and in fact the Labour motion went further than the SNP proposal. Yet he's furious. Why? Because his proposal contained a single sentence that had nothing to do with calling for a ceasefire that would have caused division within Labour. Note that last Autumn when the SNP proposed a motion calling for a ceasefire it wasn't carried but there was a Labour rebellion. Flynn didn't say a word. His motion failed but he got what he really wanted. So what is his real motive? Why is he so angry? Because the speaker has ruined his plot to cause trouble within Labour's ranks. It seems that this is a man entirely without honour, a man who would step over the bones of dead children and babies just to cause friction in an opposing party that is now more popular than his own. For that reason he is not fit to be an MP.

  2. how is it that personal attacks (here at 0:36 : « weak and fickle leader » ― but both sides resort to it on occasions…) are still part of the culture of the House of Commons ? how can this be considered proper parliamentary language ? it's so childish it's not even acceptable in schoolyards…

  3. Where was Mordaunt and her sham indignation when Jonson and co were breaking all the parliamentary rules in the book (including breaking the law). Unusually blind, deaf and dumb then wasn't she? A hypocrite who fits well in with all the current Tories. Conservatives – party before country, every time

  4. I don't understand why mandrake mordor is bashing Labour. If the tories (goverement) hadn't pulled out of the thing, then all 3 parties (tory, lab, snp) would have been able to vote on the thing. so surely it's the fault of the tories?

Leave a Reply