UUkraine

i hate to break it to you but….. russians saying they took out a SU27…. the SU 27s have been sitting there for the last 30 years they are used for parts. non flyable… so they used a 10 million dollar rocket to take out scrap metal

  • July 2, 2024



i hate to break it to you but…..
russians saying they took out a SU27….
the SU 27s have been sitting there for the last 30 years
they are used for parts. non flyable…
so they used a 10 million dollar rocket to take out scrap metal

https://x.com/secretsqrl123/status/1807922911971278995?s=46&t=r5VmHj6OxdJ8TOTYqYY5Rg

by Wallname_Liability

17 comments

  1. If so, the guy in the kremlin that keep an eye on google earth better not approach windows for the next few months.

  3. How many such situations happened to Russians and people just celebrated destroying Russian planes? This seems like cope to me… Be objective people, any attack on an airbase is bad news

  6. False it’s been confirmed by multiple credible Russian non biased and some Ukrainian telegram channels.

  7. I’m not sure what this is supposed to be showing? Those planes have clearly moved between those two images. And they both appear to be from 2024.

  9. Bottom line to me: it doesn’t matter if they were or weren’t junk. If you don’t expect losses like this in war, then you are missing it.

    A country that had zero military of any kind was invaded and then repelled the invasion with a hastily assembled aid package. They continue to fight and push back against a force that was supposed to be a near-peer with the US.

    This isn’t Afghanistan, American warships weren’t being sunk. The New Soviet Klepocracy can’t even win the conflict to deal with the struggles of an Afghanistan-style occupation. They’re losing, and they’re too proud to know when to quit.

  10. I wish this guy was right, but the location of the planes in these images is totally different to the [location of the planes that were visible in the video of the strike(s).](https://i.imgur.com/y9cjkaR.png)

    [Suchomimus](https://www.youtube.com/@suchomimus9921) uploaded a decent analysis of the video footage about an hour ago (link below), but even that seems to be grasping at straws. He doesn’t believe the planes are visible in the footage of the second cluster munition strike, but I think they’re just rendered hard to see from video compression.

    [https://youtu.be/iSD-bJA6vR4?si=xlhf9ZAXH9dTbZhs](https://youtu.be/iSD-bJA6vR4?si=xlhf9ZAXH9dTbZhs)

    It’s certainly possible that these are old frames being moved around the base as decoys, but there’s really not enough info available to come to that conclusion. The fact that planes have been visible at this base in the past proves nothing.

  11. They needed a video to show they can also destroy some military stuff to stay relevant.

  12. It doesn’t matter. I hate to break it to you that damaging planes used for parts reduces the supply of parts used for flying, in the same way bombing a parts supply depot.

  13. He is just a hopium pedlar, he has had Russian forces in Kharkiv encircled and destroyed multiple times this month.

    Who knows what condition the su-27s were in but they have been mobile recently and the airbase is active. Worst case they are active aircraft, best case they were already damaged aircraft needing repair or relatively whole aircraft being canibalised. Only difference is whether ir hurts Ukraine today or next week.

  14. Source?

    I mean, in the two pictures the planes are all in different positions (and number).

  15. I’ve seen the US aviation B-52 boneyard on satellite view. This is not how a parts boneyard looks from the air.

  16. As long as the pilots are OK, fine. It takes 18->25 years to make one of those. More planes can come from the US and NATO.

  17. Well, considering they usually confuse schools and hospitals with military targets I guess they’re improving?

Leave a Reply