Its valuation is around €30M, a sum that the owners intend to (eventually) reinvest only in part on the market (€10M-€12M, the rest in cash). Marseille are in the early stages but the interest is real and the negotiation could turn into something concrete.

https://x.com/guarropas/status/1808447449851129970?s=46&t=HVZJzoyLgN2cnje_SdLm6w

by ForzaInter_1908

5 comments
  1. The cost of being poor, even a billion dollar club can’t escape it

  2. Sell your biggest talents. Spend that money on washed backup salaries.

    I support management on a lot of things but the treatment of youth players isn’t one of them. Di Gregorio saga cost us 15m just 2 years later and talent wise a downgrade. This will be another regret if he is sold.

  3. Not being sarcastic or anything can someone ELI5 the hype around Carboni? Ik he’s very young but he scored twice for Monza, 30M seems like a very good offer

  4. We deserve another banter era if we keep it up with these stupid transfers, both incoming and outgoing. We could have Di Gregorio right now if we’d sold him with a buyback clause. He was *our player*. We sold Pinamonti only to have players like Correa, Alexis and Arnautovic. We were interested in 24 year old Retegui, only to sign 34 year old Arnautovic instead, and for almost the same price. We want to sell Zanotti and bring back Perisic. In the past, we swapped Zaniolo for a 30 year old Nainggolan. And now, we want to sell a 19 year old that’s been called the future of Argentina by Messi and Scaloni, for what? To buy a 26 year old who’s had one good season in his career? What about giving Venezia Oristanio in exchange for a worse player? Dimarco is the only Inter youth player to succeed at Inter in a long time for a reason, and that reason isn’t a lack of quality youth prospects.

    I know, I know, we’ve had more hits than misses, but when we struggle to find solutions to problems we created for ourselves, when we had the players we needed *in the club* already, it’s hard not to be somewhat disappointed.

Leave a Reply