UUkraine

Chinese Troops Deploy to Poland’s Border

  • July 23, 2024



Chinese Troops Deploy to Poland’s Border

Thanks to HelloFresh for sponsoring today’s video. Go to https://strms.net/hellofresh_task_purpose, use my code TASKJUL10, and receive 10 free meals + free appetizers for life! One appetizer item per box while subscription is active if you’re in the US. The link and code are valid in all countries and the respective local discount will apply. TASKJUL10

In July 2024 China transported soldiers 3,000 miles away into Belarus. They conducted joint training exercises only 1.7 miles away from NATO member Poland’s border and 40 miles away from the border with Ukraine. Does this mean its time to sound the alarmist alarm? The chinese are coming the chinese are coming!

The reason this has made world news headlines is because of the implication. Beijing hasn’t done a mission like this since 2015. The timing of this drill indicates the CCP is sending a warning message to the United States that they are prepared to deploy troops to fight against NATO in Europe. BUT it begs the question, COULD they actually project power into Europe? How many troops could they deploy and sustain that far away from their borders and how long would it take them to build up combat power?

Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSq3p5NKEtyp5Rjd4ctiEbg/join

Task & Purpose is a military news and culture oriented channel. We want to foster discussion about the defense industry.

Email capelluto@taskandpurpose.com for inquires.

32 comments

  1. Thanks to HelloFresh for sponsoring today's video. Go to https://strms.net/hellofresh_task_purpose, use my code TASKJUL10, and receive 10 free meals + free appetizers for life! One appetizer item per box while subscription is active if you’re in the US. The link and code are valid in all countries and the respective local discount will apply. TASKJUL10

  2. Britain has the CHALLENGER! A tank proven to be the 'okayest' tank on the modern battlefield.
    Also we have upto SEVERAL soldiers ready for action in a moment's notice (couple of months).
    Putin better think again.

  4. Please don't get me wrong. This information is fantastic. However shouldn't you include the flight time and availability of ICBMs?

  12. I mean, idk when you have an entire conglomerate, such as Nato denouncing your country as a whole. I see no reason why you wouldn't want to confirm your friendships around your border. Once again, the West is so scared of China that they have to do everything they can to "stop evil China" and make sure you know about it.

  16. China doesn't have the logistics. They'd be dependent on the Russians for transport – a terrible idea – and if they tried to go via water, they'd have to run the gauntlet of death, and if they tried air-transport, well… Would you intercept me? I'd intercept me…

  17. 🇧🇩বাংলাদেশের সুলতান🇧🇩বাংলাদেশ চীন রাশিয়া তুরস্ক ইরান 🇧🇩🇨🇳🇷🇺🇹🇷🇮🇷. না ভারত পাকিস্তান মার্কিন যুক্তরাষ্ট্র এবং পশ্চিম!👆 বাংলাদেশের 🇧🇩😎🇧🇩🇨🇳☝️🐯🐯🐯

  19. It is virtually impossible for China to transport any military to Belarus without Russia’s permission. If the war breaks out, Russia might urge China to build a high speed rail to Belarus through Russia.

  20. The EFFECTS OF AI⁉️⁉️⁉️⁉️⁉️⁉️⁉️⁉️⁉️⁉️⁉️⁉️⁉️⁉️⁉️⁉️⁉️⁉️⁉️⁉️⁉️⁉️

  23. China really hasn't developed their foreign reach capabilities so them projecting power is a bit of a ways out there. I say this because they deployed about 9 "aircraft carriers" into the South China Sea in the forms of garbage islands and they're struggling to get their 3 mobile carrier to get to the shores they want it to. It definitely isn't meant for the deep end of the pool. They're more concerned about their local defense than foreign power projection, so if the need ever occurred where they HAD to mobilize, they'd be caught on the back foot or you probably wouldn't see any Chinese troops on the frontlines because their borders will miraculously have dozens of thousands of troops and assets deployed to them. I think China is trying to have a "Swiss Army Knife" approach of having 1 asset solves all problems, but the problem is that even us in the US have ditched that fantasy and have realized that a C-5 carries more than a C-17, but costs more to run and can't operate on what a C-130 can, so that's why we use all 3.

    I'm going to say objectively the C-5 is a cool machine for what it's able to do. I'll also say objectively if China wants their own B.U.F.F. they can dish out the money required for a B.U.F.F. program and learn like the US did with that thing. But China's really quadrupling down with their tech really being restricted to being really local while they're toting about wanting to be a global power. Part of being a global power is being able to "respond appropriately" in foreign lands should the need arise. The only other method that could be available to China, but has even less practical and financial sense in it, is something like an ICTM (Inter-Continental Transport Missile.) I don't think that's a thing, but both the UK and US tested Missile Mail and delivering things hundreds of miles away in a matter of minutes is achievable with high atmosphere reentry vehicles. It's just it's not covert, it's costly, and you're essentially bombing your destination. Is that a nuke or your Amazon package breaking the stratosphere? NORAD doesn't care.

  26. Oh! I kept having to tell myself to sit quietly and listen! I kept jumping ahead with things just to have you cover them one by one. I should share this with the Quartermaster folks in my friends lists! Stay safe.

  27. The reason why China/Russia coalition is doomed to fail is because of how incredibly racist Russia is. Top brass might flirt on TV, but if soldiers get send into a fight together, they will be on each other's throats before they even see an enemy. If you think American south rednecks are racist, you should go to Russia and see what real racism looks like, especially against Asian people. Also China and Russia culturally are basically the exact opposite of one another, where NATO is comprised mostly of countries which share similar cultural values. This superpower duo looks scary on paper, but in reality it will be a lot less effective. That is unless we involve nukes, but if it comes to that, well… it's pretty much Game Over for everyone all over the globe.

Leave a Reply