All Official FC Barcelona Player Ratings In EA FC 25

by Username-_-Password

42 comments
  1. How can you give Yamal just that?

    Top 3 players at Euro, good season at Barca. Hes at least an 86.

    82 dribbling? 76 passing?

  2. I was baffled by a lot of these but I just noticed Fermin and that has to be the worst one. Scored like 10+ goals last season, only behind Lewy and maybe someone else, important goals in UCL knockout, Olympics winner where he was 2nd top scorer of the tournament. Morons at EA: Lets give him 76 rating 🤡

  3. I don’t even play “fifa” but these are hilariously stupid. Cubarsi alone is absurd, but also Fermin & even Yamal.

    I realise they are still EA and want to keep them low so they can make more money on upgraded cards in UT, but these are also their starting ratings in career mode then which is also just plain ignorant.

    But EA being clueless is hardly shocking news to anyone at this point.

  4. Gavi 83, Yamal 81 and Cubarsi 72 is cynical af. Another year I’m not buying fifa last one was 2020

  5. Cubarsi should at least be a 78. And that passing stat is criminal. Hopefully he gets upgrades as the season progresses

  6. Half of these are wrong. Cubarsi 72? He’s probabaly he best U20 CB in the world and these mfers gave him a rating less than Maguire. Fermin 76? After the level of performances last season and are the Olympics? Disgraceful. Yamal 81 with Torres as 80 is sacrilege, Yamal is much better. And why is Fati a CAM? If Mbappé gets 92 and Vini 90, it is proof EA are Real fanboys

  7. CAP how can Ter Stegen be our best player is a joke a big joke. (Like many would even say one of the weak link though i don’t agree but will also say not a strong link too)

  8. It’s funny how much ea glazes Madrid and even on the internet evolution side of things throughout the year most cards that fit where for Madrid players

  9. Cubarsi’s rating and especially his passing stat shows precisely that EA isn’t paying attention to football and kinda just wing it sometimes.

  10. Yamal 81? Fermin 76? Cubarsi 72? It just gets worse and worse

    All three of them are Golden Boy contenders, Cubarsi and Fermin should be at least 80 (personally 81 or 82) and Yamal should be like an 84

    Watch Endrick get an 82

  11. Lamine, Balde + 2

    Pedri, Araujo, Kounde, Raph, Christensen + 1

    Fermin – 80

    Cubarsi – 79 (gotta be higher than Torre and Eric 🙄)

    I’m okay with the rest

  12. Fermín less than Fati and Cubarsí less than Pablo Torre??? Cubarsí 52 passing???

    Excuse me EA? I don’t know what drugs do you guys take, but can you get me some of that shit too, cause it’s obviously really good

  13. De Jong , gavi and Ansu Fati should be lower. Fermin and cubarsi should be higher

  14. What on god’s green earth is EA doing? These ratings are way WAAY off what they should be… Cubarsi 72!?!? Ansu Fati is a CAM now, that’s news to me 🤣 Fermín 76?! You gotta be kidding me , watch how they’ll make a bunch of randos from the Prem more high k rated

  15. In my honest opinion:

    1. Lewandowski 89
    2. Ter Stegen 88
    3. Araujo 86
    4. De Jong 86
    5. Pedri 85
    6. Raphinha 85
    7. Kounde 85
    8. Olmo 85
    9. Christensen 84
    10. Yamal 83
    11. Gavi 83
    12. Inigo 82
    13. Ferran 81
    14. Garcia 81
    15. Balde 80
    16. Roberto 80
    17. Cubarsi 78
    18. Pena 77
    19. Alonso 77
    20. Fati 77
    21. Fermin 76
    22. Pablo Torre 72

  16. It’s EA. Their ratings rarely reflect player’s preformances throughout the season or career in general.

Leave a Reply