Is this just HR McMasters delighting over what he was able to accomplish as NSA? Because I don’t see how attributing things to Trump that he doesn’t understand or know makes much sense.
Drivel. I don’t know what McMmasters point was. Instead of an analysis from his unique vantage point in and out of the administration, he just lists stuff. “Trump was bad, but kinda good” and “Trump did this good thing but also these bad things.” This reads a second time like nothing but talking points and rebuttals for people to reflexively say, “But Trump got NATO to pay more!” Etc. etc. But did he? And was the means worth the ends?
2 comments
Is this just HR McMasters delighting over what he was able to accomplish as NSA? Because I don’t see how attributing things to Trump that he doesn’t understand or know makes much sense.
Drivel. I don’t know what McMmasters point was. Instead of an analysis from his unique vantage point in and out of the administration, he just lists stuff. “Trump was bad, but kinda good” and “Trump did this good thing but also these bad things.”
This reads a second time like nothing but talking points and rebuttals for people to reflexively say, “But Trump got NATO to pay more!” Etc. etc.
But did he? And was the means worth the ends?