Exclusive: Ukraine army chief reveals the strategy behind Kursk incursion



Exclusive: Ukraine army chief reveals the strategy behind Kursk incursion

In his first-ever television interview, Commander-in-Chief of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, Oleksandr Syrskyi, speaks to CNN’s Christiane Amanpour about Ukraine’s incursion into Russia, morale within the Ukrainian Army and what it’s like fighting Russia on the frontline. #CNN #News

Want to stay up to date on the day’s top stories? Sign up for CNN’s 5 Things newsletter, and we’ll give you the 5 biggest stories you need to know, videos people are watching, and more! Sign up here: https://www.cnn.com/newsletters/5-things?source=nl-acq_social_youtubedesc&utm_source=nl-acq_social_youtubedesc

24 comments
  1. Again a lot of blablabla and no real infos, a view on the map explains, the area gained is small and a push trough towards south-east lacks personal and waepons. Another point is, doo the people of UA really want to kick out Russians ? Sanctions against Putin seems to be in favor for the Putin. So he can sell his gas and oil to a new market.

  2. Whag a crock. The ongoing change in describing the Ukraine invasion of Kurst is laughable, as is the excuse of ghe US 7 month wpns pckg delay. AYear ago Biden said Rusia lost the war. Again laugha le.

  3. The analysts I've been watching have been saying this since the start of the Kursk invasion. Why does it take CNN weeks to clock onto this? Surely their reporters are better than arm chair war analysts on Youtube?

  4. Why are we assuming he's being candid? I'm a supporter of the general, absolutely, but he's not relating reality to you on matters of training. A month would be great if it happened, but even when it does, it's days on end of crab-ass with nothing to do. You've volunteers out there with weapons they've never fired. (I am not making that up.) Kursk also doesn't border Kharkiv oblast. Belgorad does. Now on this point it's the two journalist mucking this up. He was talking about a potential invasion of Sumy similar to what had been happening in Kharkiv. That makes sense, to a point. I think the differential that's important is do you want to be fighting the Russians in Russian villages or Ukrainian towns. That's the question a serious reporter would have asked. And stop throwing the word "strategic" around so carelessly. Bakhmut was "strategic", Adviivka was "strategic". Just very lightweight journalism from CNN on this. Just taking someone at their word doesn't make them candid. It's not his job to tell CNN the truth. His job is to win this war. It's CNN's job to inform us and I don't think people are any better informed after that softball interview.

Leave a Reply