14 Sep: STRATEGIC SUCCESS! Ukrainians Force Russians SACRIFICE POKROVSK OFFENSIVE. | War in Ukraine



14 Sep: STRATEGIC SUCCESS! Ukrainians Force Russians SACRIFICE POKROVSK OFFENSIVE. | War in Ukraine

๐Ÿ”ด Support via Online Store: https://goldenheart.store/collections/bestsellers
๐Ÿ”ต EXCLUSIVE Strategic Updates on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/RFUnews
๐Ÿ”ต EXCLUSIVE Strategic Updates on YouTube Membership: https://www.youtube.com/ReportingFromUkraine/join
๐Ÿ”žUNCENSORED COMBAT FOOTAGE on Telegram: https://t.me/RFUEnglish or @RFUEnglish
๐ŸŸ  Support via Thanks button donation under the video (next to “like” and “share”)
๐ŸŸ  Support via 1-time donation: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/ReportingFromUA
โšซ Follow us on Twitter/X: https://twitter.com/RFUEnglish or @RFUEnglish

Today there are a lot of important updates from the Kursk direction.

Here, in a critical turning point, Ukrainian forces finally managed to escalate the pressure in the Kursk region to such an extent that the Russians were forced to sacrifice their Pokrovsk offensive and redeploy their most critical reserves to the north. By disrupting the biggest Russian offensive operation, on which Russians staked everything, the Ukrainian Kursk offensive proved to be a strategic success.

In the Korenevo area, Ukrainian forces significantly outnumbered the Russian defenders of the town and its surroundings. As the Russians lost substantial territory on the northern and southern flanks, Korenevo faced an imminent threat of encirclement. Russian forces anticipated Ukrainian attacks from Snagost and Krasnoktyabrske to the south, as well as from the railway embankment to the north, where the Ukrainians held strong positions that could serve as a base for further assaults.

As a result, the Russian command has been gradually redeploying troops to bolster their defenses in Kursk, forces initially intended to support the offensive in Pokrovsk. This shift is crucial because drawing Russian forces away from Pokrovsk was the primary Ukrainian strategic objective and the aim of the Kursk offensive. Consequently, the Russian command sought to avoid deploying reserves from Pokrovsk at all costs. They redeployed troops from various parts of the frontline, including Chasiv Yar, but avoided drawing from Pokrovsk to maintain their momentum.

However, the worsening situation in and around Korenevo, coupled with the risk of encirclement by Ukrainian forcesโ€”which would open a route to Glushkovoโ€”necessitated further redeployment of forces and equipment to alleviate the pressure. That is why the Russians were eventually compelled to redeploy troops from Pokrovsk as well. According to Russian sources, this included elements from the Fifteenth Motorized Rifle Brigade and the First Sloviansk Brigade. After accumulating forces, Russians even started launching conterattacks around Korenevo. The goal of these counterattacks is to remove the Ukrainian pressure on the town from the southern flank.

The first wave of counterattacks comprised eight armored vehicles and at least seventy soldiers. Geolocated footage from the area shows the assault group advancing on the road from Korenevo to Snagost. Upon entering the village, they faced fierce resistance from Ukrainian fighters defending their positions. The Russian BMPs fired from their autocannons to provide cover for the dismounting infantry. The full uncensored combat footage of all operations can be found on our Telegram channel through the link in the description.

The Russians would not be able to sustain such counterattacks without a substantial increase in available troops in the region. Ukrainian Commander-in-Chief Oleksandr Syrsky stated that the Russians redeployed up to thirty thousand troops from unspecified directions to Kursk. Meanwhile, President Volodymyr Zelensky stated that there are up to sixty thousand Russian troops across the northeastern border from Bryansk to Kharkiv, including Kursk. Syrsky also noted that the number of troops, initially at thirty thousand, is expected to rise as the Russians plan further counteroffensive efforts in the Kursk region.

By forcing the Russians to deploy a significant number of reserves to Kursk, the Ukrainian command was able to alter the war’s trajectory. The diversion of most Russian reserves to the Kursk region led to a slowdown in the Pokrovsk offensive due to inadequate reserves, which were unable to replace heavy losses and maintain the previous operational tempo. Therefore, Ukrainian forces managed to stabilize the Pokrovsk front and even begin pushing the Russians back around New York and Selydove, once the most critical and dynamic parts of the front. This success achieved the primary goal of the Kursk incursion: undermining the Russians’ theater-wide initiative.

But this was just the beginning of the bad news for the Russians. The large deployment of Russian reserves to Kursk forced the Russian Northern Command to quickly establish logistics hubs, including ammunition and fuel depots, in Belgorod and Voronezh to support the counterattacks. Ukrainian Military Intelligence tracked the increased movement of Russian forces and identified the location of an ammunition…

48 comments
  1. ๐Ÿ”ด Support via Online Store: https://goldenheart.store/collections/bestsellers

    ๐Ÿ”ต EXCLUSIVE Strategic Updates on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/RFUnews

    ๐Ÿ”ต EXCLUSIVE Strategic Updates on YouTube Membership: https://www.youtube.com/ReportingFromUkraine/join

    ๐Ÿ”žUNCENSORED COMBAT FOOTAGE on Telegram: https://t.me/RFUEnglish or @RFUEnglish

    ๐ŸŸ  Support via Thanks button donation under the video (next to "like" and "share")

    ๐ŸŸ  Support via 1-time donation: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/ReportingFromUA

    โšซ Follow us on Twitter/X: https://twitter.com/RFUEnglish or @RFUEnglish

  2. The reason Ukraine moves faster is they planned there moves Russia just sends a lot of soldiers and equipment which means they lose a lot of soldier and equipment and only gain 50yards this is not sustainable notice they are starting to have problems with not enough soldiers to attack with and are having high numbers of desertion and surrendering

  3. ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ‘

  4. Ill take "Things that didn't happen" for $1000 Alex. Bro, Russia DOES NOT need to redeploy troops from other sectors to shore up defenses. They have 4X as many men as Ukraine. Just because they do it, DOES NOT mean the same thing happens in Russia. What will you say when all this turns out to be a bunch of BS? Not just this video but all the videos highlighting Ukraines Kursk and Donbas progress the past two months. You are lying, you're lying. This is 100% paid for by GUR in some fashion.

  5. ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐ŸŒป๐Ÿ’™๐Ÿ’›๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐ŸŒป๐Ÿ’™๐Ÿ’›๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐ŸŒป๐Ÿ’™๐Ÿ’›๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐ŸŒป๐ŸŒป

  6. Wouldn't the goal – stopping the russians advancing in Pokrovsk – also been achieved if the Ukrainians sent their troops directly to Pokrovsk for a counter attack?

  7. I was expecting something like this from the beginning. But I wonder what kind of range you had on those supply strikes, while US-UK are still in "productive" talks about it?

  8. So… it seems the Russians did take the bait. For weeks pundits said Putin did not react and he would not stop his advance in Donbas to defend the homeland. The success of Kursk and the cost was questioned. And now… we see the long game playing out. Ukraine is always one step ahead of The Kremlin.

  9. Ukraines kursk breakthrough is just another nail on the head for Ukraines logistics it's a dead weight, Ukraine successfully assembled a highly mobilised army but instead of using it for a breakthrough in the eastern front the tactically bankrupt general staff used it in kursk which is strategically of no value, all they manage is getting a lot of POWS.

  10. Slava Ukraini ๐Ÿ’™๐Ÿ’›๐Ÿ’™๐Ÿ’›๐Ÿ’™๐Ÿ’›๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ

Leave a Reply