[Matt Lawton] Manchester City appear to have secured a potentially significant victory in their legal battle with the Premier League after a vote on APT rule amendments was dropped from today’s meeting. Points to wider implications for the rules.

by TheBiasedSportsLover

27 comments
  1. I don’t what meeting they’re referring to, what APT stands for, or what rule amendments they’re talking about, but this is bullshit and I am outraged

  2. So this begs the real question… how many points get deducted from Everton due to this rule amendment?

  3. It would be surprising if they actually get any punishment at all. They just pay off whoever they need to.

  4. FYI this is separate to the 115 charges case.

    Basically Man City said clubs should be allowed to earn money via sponsorship through companies which are under the same ownership as the club itself. Looks like they’re getting their way.

    So if the owner of a club also owns an airline (for example) then that airline can sponsor that club for an insane amount of money, aiding FFP, and it will be allowed. Previously the FA had to agree to the amount coming in.

  5. What a shock (not)

    I think they’ll get a small fine and the PL will celebrate at their success

    Even when they mentioned the cause of the PL legal bills

  6. Things like this make you realise how little people know what they’re taking/complaining about online.

    This isn’t the 115 charges, it’s another legal battle.

  7. If this does turn out to be true and Man City have secured a victory here, kiss what little competitiveness that’s left in the prem goodbye. Allowing state owned clubs has now potentially begun the demise of this league…..another Ligue 1 incoming. Maybe a government appointed regulator is the last hope? Because Richard Masters and crew are running the league into the ground.

  8. Should of just stuck with the super league with the added additions of promotion and relegation, they’d of actually made financial rules to keep PSG, City and Newcastle in check.

  9. As a Newcastle fan will believe it when I see it.

    Just because they cancel the vote doesn’t mean they won’t make amendments and bring it back.

    Man City are not our friends and ultimately they will sell us under the table if it benefits them.

    If the premier league allow Man City a bye during the years they’ve breached and agree to new rules do I really think those new rules will be allowed to benefit us?

    Heck do I!

  10. I would need to see the official ruling before making a judgement.

    maybe the PL didnt want to vote on a law that is still in contention.

    even if Man city win their case, they still have a lot of charges to deal with and their issue isnt the associated party rules but rather the fact they lied about who really funded their club.

    as the original assumption was that City is not a state club but rather a side hobby for a billionaire.

Leave a Reply