No numbers or percentages just “high to low risk”?
That’s a lot of ambiguity.
[deleted]
But have you considered subscribing to Real Insight?
all the blacks and mexicans.
-all these israelis(jerkoffs) downvoting me.
Huh. South Carolina. That’s wild.
Hey Kansas city is rocking a yellow….we win again!
That’s a nice population density map that also highlights poverty-stricken areas you got there. Useless without actually giving a scale, but other than that, still pretty useless.
You gonna die in the south
“The South shall rise again!”
Is Nebraska so high because ownership or possession of firearms are largely unregulated outside two cities? 12 years here in south central Nebraska, maybe one a year on the news I hear about somebody discharging a weapon. My previous home country in Illinois is several steps lower and firearms were multiple times a week.
See that bright northern star son? That’s where we live… In the land… Of MINNEAPOLIS!
Love the fact that everywhere outside US is white /s
Data is beautiful, but this coloring scheme is gawk awful
Would love to see this side by side with a gang violence map
My guess is bright spots that seem isolated are driven by gang violence, while bright swaths primarily in the south are driven by general accessibility and poor governance/poverty
OP: “I made a map that highlights gun violence risks”
Reddit: “A brand new map, or an another population density map?”
OP: “It’s a population density map”
Sorry, I can’t find my glasses. Is this a map of democratic counties in yellow?
Wait, I was told that Chicago was so much more dangerous than the south.
“The Mississippi delta was shining like a National guitar”
Bridgeport CT is marked, but not NYC
Is this map saying that my risk goes up, the closer i live to a federal law enforcement training center?
21 comments
Sources: Gun Violence Archive, US Census, Overture Maps Foundation (building data at detailed level).
Tools: PostGIS, MapLibre GL JS, Nominatim Geocoder, Martin Tileserver
Interactive version: [https://www.realbloc.com/map/?theme=gun-violence#3.99/36.04/-98.47](https://www.realbloc.com/map/?theme=gun-violence#3.99/36.04/-98.47)
No numbers or percentages just “high to low risk”?
That’s a lot of ambiguity.
[deleted]
But have you considered subscribing to Real Insight?
all the blacks and mexicans.
-all these israelis(jerkoffs) downvoting me.
Huh. South Carolina. That’s wild.
Hey Kansas city is rocking a yellow….we win again!
That’s a nice population density map that also highlights poverty-stricken areas you got there. Useless without actually giving a scale, but other than that, still pretty useless.
You gonna die in the south
“The South shall rise again!”
Is Nebraska so high because ownership or possession of firearms are largely unregulated outside two cities? 12 years here in south central Nebraska, maybe one a year on the news I hear about somebody discharging a weapon. My previous home country in Illinois is several steps lower and firearms were multiple times a week.
See that bright northern star son? That’s where we live… In the land… Of MINNEAPOLIS!
Love the fact that everywhere outside US is white /s
Data is beautiful, but this coloring scheme is gawk awful
Would love to see this side by side with a gang violence map
My guess is bright spots that seem isolated are driven by gang violence, while bright swaths primarily in the south are driven by general accessibility and poor governance/poverty
OP: “I made a map that highlights gun violence risks”
Reddit: “A brand new map, or an another population density map?”
OP: “It’s a population density map”
Sorry, I can’t find my glasses. Is this a map of democratic counties in yellow?
Wait, I was told that Chicago was so much more dangerous than the south.
“The Mississippi delta was shining like a National guitar”
Bridgeport CT is marked, but not NYC
Is this map saying that my risk goes up, the closer i live to a federal law enforcement training center?