How couples met (trend from 1930 to 2024) Posted by potHead_18 Tags:DataData Is BeautifulDataIsBeautiful 3 comments college 0.74% is wild. decline of neighbors and chuch relatively make sense. friends overtaking family connections is probably a good thing. interesting to compare relatively, ignoring online How do they define couples? Because more than 0.74% of the couples holding hands on a college campus met in college (obviously). I met my wife on love@aol in 2000 We told everyone that we met at a bar Even when online dating became ubiquitous, we still kept up the lie because we felt like we were in too deep by then Leave a ReplyYou must be logged in to post a comment.
college 0.74% is wild. decline of neighbors and chuch relatively make sense. friends overtaking family connections is probably a good thing. interesting to compare relatively, ignoring online
How do they define couples? Because more than 0.74% of the couples holding hands on a college campus met in college (obviously).
I met my wife on love@aol in 2000 We told everyone that we met at a bar Even when online dating became ubiquitous, we still kept up the lie because we felt like we were in too deep by then
3 comments
college 0.74% is wild. decline of neighbors and chuch relatively make sense. friends overtaking family connections is probably a good thing.
interesting to compare relatively, ignoring online
How do they define couples? Because more than 0.74% of the couples holding hands on a college campus met in college (obviously).
I met my wife on love@aol in 2000
We told everyone that we met at a bar
Even when online dating became ubiquitous, we still kept up the lie because we felt like we were in too deep by then