Are u really relevant in world’s history if u didn’t had 50+ colonies ?

by Helpwithmyname

26 comments
  1. I will console myself about our irrelevance by browsing the Porsche catalogue.

  2. What colonies did we have other than the two small islands in the Caribbean and outside Africa?

  3. Don’t give credit to France when it’s not deserved

  4. I think even having +50 colonies wont make you relevant either, just pure evil and assholness

  5. False, we have two: Tallinn and little bit of Canary islands.

  6. yeah but imagine being overshadowed by your former colony 😬😬

  7. This is Curonian erasure and I won’t stand for it

  8. 52 colonies and yet even Belgium is more relevant today than Poortugal is. When people hear Portuguese they think of Brazil instead of you. How did you manage to mess this up so badly, Joao?

  9. What about poor Latvia 🙁 Courland had colonies

  10. We had many colonies but not in the colonial Era

  11. Portugal counting trading port in the coast of Africa as “colony” to pump up the numbers.

  12. Rare Portugal W

    EDIT: map isn’t correct though. Latvia/Lithuania/Poland should have 1-2 depending how you look at it.

  13. No, you’re only relevant if your former colonies were Western Europe

  14. I won’t take my Hansbros not being respected, without him we wouldn’t have EU

  15. Hey, give us credit, Austria’s 1 is the same for everyone in the Empire, but especially us, it wasn’t called Austria-Hungary for nothing

  16. But how much is that per capita, asking the real questions here.

  17. Well, what do you expect when places like Botswana were actually asking us to colonise them because the other colonial powers were so awful?

  18. Norway and Denmark having different number of colonies even though we were in a Union…

  19. I’m pulling up this map next time I hear I’m a “coloniser” due to my skin tone

Leave a Reply