HomeUkraine2024 Kursk Offensive visually confirmed equipment losses as of 15 October 2024. In summary: 251 (+20) Ukrainian 🇺🇦 losses vs. 181 (+26) Russian 🇷🇺 losses
2024 Kursk Offensive visually confirmed equipment losses as of 15 October 2024. In summary: 251 (+20) Ukrainian 🇺🇦 losses vs. 181 (+26) Russian 🇷🇺 losses
October 17, 2024
2024 Kursk Offensive visually confirmed equipment losses as of 15 October 2024. In summary: 251 (+20) Ukrainian 🇺🇦 losses vs. 181 (+26) Russian 🇷🇺 losses
And we’ll have a dozen people come and insist that Kursk was a success
I wonder when this offensive will be objectively analyzed here. Ukrainian leaders disagreed with it from the onset. Experts shared that sentiment. It failed in its main objective and diverted experienced troops away from where they were desperately needed in the east. Russia is steadily recapturing the land and inflicting heavy casualties that cannot be replaced. To Ukrainian leaders and objective observers, it was a disaster. But here? Total success!
1000 Russian POW
Jesus christ that’s a bad ratio, and for what? What a waste of men, resources and time.
High Ukrainian losses if this is the average value.
On the other hand, russia is today at 14 km from the roundabout North of Prochrovsk, that is zero progress since sep 16th. Conversely, russia advanced about 5 km in the Prochrovsk direction between aug 16th and sep 16th.
A 100% decrease in the speed of advance.
What if 50,000 available soldiers, from the Zhaporizja and Cherson frontlines and freshly recruited ones, had all been moved to Prochrovsk instead of russia?
A complete stop in advance is very significant.
A very steep price is clearly being paid by russia for its ongoing attempt to finally reoccupy its own territory in Kursk oblast.
Imo, they never followed up this properly to encircle Russian positions. Now they just dragged DPRK into this whole thing
6 comments
And we’ll have a dozen people come and insist that Kursk was a success
I wonder when this offensive will be objectively analyzed here. Ukrainian leaders disagreed with it from the onset. Experts shared that sentiment. It failed in its main objective and diverted experienced troops away from where they were desperately needed in the east. Russia is steadily recapturing the land and inflicting heavy casualties that cannot be replaced. To Ukrainian leaders and objective observers, it was a disaster. But here? Total success!
1000 Russian POW
Jesus christ that’s a bad ratio, and for what? What a waste of men, resources and time.
High Ukrainian losses if this is the average value.
On the other hand, russia is today at 14 km from the roundabout North of Prochrovsk, that is zero progress since sep 16th. Conversely, russia advanced about 5 km in the Prochrovsk direction between aug 16th and sep 16th.
A 100% decrease in the speed of advance.
What if 50,000 available soldiers, from the Zhaporizja and Cherson frontlines and freshly recruited ones, had all been moved to Prochrovsk instead of russia?
A complete stop in advance is very significant.
A very steep price is clearly being paid by russia for its ongoing attempt to finally reoccupy its own territory in Kursk oblast.
Imo, they never followed up this properly to encircle Russian positions. Now they just dragged DPRK into this whole thing