“NATO or NUKES!” Can Ukraine acquire Nukes? Ukraine War Sitrep

30 comments

1. === Support the Channel ===
   
   Patreon: https://is.gd/zkWALE
   
   Bank transfer (in Europe): IBAN: DE81740512300060352457; BIC: BYLADEM1FRG
   
   Paypal: https://bit.ly/3RTvVR4
   
   Crypto: https://mgeschichte.com/krypto-crypto/
   
   Affiliate: https://mgeschichte.com/affiliate/
   
   Amazon Wishlist: https://amzn.to/3hbBf5d

2. This is maddening when NATO could shut Russia down with a few days of air campaign, leaving Ukraine open to take the land back

3. Ukraine never had nukes. Same as Turkey or Germany or Italy have US nukes on its territory. There used to be Russian or Soviet nukes on Ukrainian territory. There were never any Ukrainian nukes ever!

4. I suppose north Korean soldiers attacking an European nation ie ukraine will again be ignored by the west which is totally shameful. I really dont know what it will take to wake up our politicians not to send troops but say 10 times the amount of weapons and aid. I despair of them

5. I really like your work and content but it always bugs me that you dont correctly frame yourself on the face camera

6. Now Ukraine give us an ultimatum?

7. So now, RoK and Ukraine have a reason to work together and share info. This could work out well for both nations. RoK produces the Missiles for the Patriot System. You can have all the Launchers and Radars a country could desire but, without the Missiles they're useless.

8. Thx T Great work

9. Yes, the intelligence reports coming out of Seoul & Ky'iv both confirm the increase in troop totals being increased from 10k to 12k now formed into 4 Brigades of 3k each. In the sanitized version I read, some of the troops being transferred are instructors to teach Russians on how to use DPRK artillery systems. I will make 2 statements of which both can be true or just 1 of them. And since both countries regular towed tube artillery are very similar and in the same calibers of 122mm & 152mm I see no reason why instructors would be needed for such systems nor the Grad systems. Now since in the DPRK's definition, rocket and tactical ballistic missiles fall into the same category as regular artillery systems, and the inference in the report does not specify one way or the other, so therefore:
   #1 DPRK could be sending more advanced artillery systems such as SPG's and/or 300mm & 600mm MLRS systems.
   #2 DPRK could be sending more of their short range tactical ballistic missiles and more trainers are needed to instruct the Russians on how to use them.
   The DPRK either way is going to get some positive feedback on any systems they use inside of Russia including CEP under battlefield conditions all the way up to results on systems that have integrated any tech transfers from Russia prior. It will also be harder for the ROK MIU to track what they are up to and what newer systems they might be being trained on to take back with them in the future. I really won't worry about such a small number of DPRK forces being sent right now, but if we start to see the heavy equipment such as tanks and SPG's being transferred and the influx of infantry becomes a monthly transfer of something like 1+ brigades, then yes this would have a major impact on the War.
   I will say though that I do expect a lot of panic amongst the N. Korean troops when they are exposed to Mr. FPV which will be the equivalent of foot infantry meeting a War Elephant on the battlefield since the only thing that flies in N. Korea is kites. I also believe they will be posted to a quiet sector of the front as far removed from the local population as possible, so I expect to see them stationed along the southern Dnipro River area where defections can be kept to a minimum. If they are badly managed and thrown into a pinnacle meat grinder situation, they will get chewed up and if no replacements are sent, then it could just be seen as a token investment by Kim Jong Un and everyone wet their pants for nothing. I hope the MID-HUR & GUR have a leaflet campaign ready to roll out to drop on these forces as well as the FPV'S and DRAGON Drones. If I hear any more juicy bites, I will be sure to post them here for all to read.

10. Makes sense, and it's only fair. Ukraine led the way in nuclear deproliferation by giving their arsenal to Russia in good faith, yet here we are.

11. Ukraine should blame the EU.
    – 95% too many bureaucrats in the EU institutions.
    – 70% too many bureaucrats on average in EU nations.
    The only thing the EU nations can produce are more taxes, more green and socialist waste.

12. NATO is such an utter and complete disappointment… they' really are letting Ukraine fight until the last man

13. Great work as always.

14. The dumbest thing Ukraine ever did was to trust the US ans sign a worthless treaty in exchange to give up their nukes. If they woukld of never given them up, Russia would of nver attacked Ukraine. The best ting now is to forget NATO membership that will never happen and do what even they can to get Nukes back into Ukraine pointed right at Moscow.

15. The Huns are coming

16. This is all irrelevant because with the pending change in administration in the USA, the war will terminate. There is no appetite in the USA to continue to fund endless wars. It's either Iraq, Afghanistan, Korea, Vietnam, Ukraine, Israel… Americans rejection of perpetual wars will be self evident within weeks. So all this talk of Russia & Ukraine is rather comical because when your sugar daddy says the game is over, the game is over.

17. Why shouldn’t they have some refined plutonium by now?

18. The more desperate the situation for Ukraine is, the bigger the BS in the media are. What is going to be next? The 348th Assault Legion from Alpha Centauri and 8 orbital destroyers deployed in Zaporozhie to help the Russian attack?
    And you vegetables gulp everything :))))

19. Torsten, you should do another more detailed video about the Ukrainian nuclear weapons. I have been following their alliance with the Pakistanis in this area for more than 2 years. I believe their warheads are already in Pakistan. Both countries have a strong interest in seeing Russia fail. Although Pakistan is self sufficient in uranium, it gets a lot of cheap grain from Ukraine. Ukraine has apparently been providing the Pakistanis intelligence about Russian weapons, which will be useful if the Pakistanis need to destroy Indian S400s. Pakistan has also not signed the nuclear non proliferation treaty. Hence, it's quite free to help the Ukrainians with the warhead designs and construction.

20. Awesome reporting

21. This reminds me of the Hollywood movie "The Mouse That Roared". I too can design and produce a "nuclear weapon", by simply going online, in Wikipedia, the FAS website, the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, WebArchive, and similar sites, where I can get ALL of the hydrocode, where and how WW2 bombs were made. All I need is "some materials", including gold, silver, platinum, tantalum, rhodium, some electronics, trigatrons, some explosives, and a couple hundred or thousands of pounds of Thorium, Uranium, Plutonium, Neptunium, or even Potassium. If given a Core, I could set one off, using instructions available on the Inet. That process is completely well understood. Somebody got into Zelensky's brain, and told him to make this "veiled threat", however ridiculous it is. My guess is that he is threatening some kind of "dirty bomb" and that NATO should deliver him, the means to slam it onto Moscow. The panic there, however small the explosion might have been, would have influenced the Russian to give up and surrender. Not likely. My gut feel is that either Zelensky has gone insane, or that somebody in his system of Advisors, needs to be "taken our to the woodshed, like our US Biden president says" and never seen again.

22. I mean assuming the West does not give them the aid they need as they have been and seeing that their acceptance into nato in the imminent future is highly unlikely. It seems like a logical tool, but I don't know how realistic it is

23. I guess the North Koreans only speak Korean and the Russians only speak Russian. How will the Koreans be integrated into the Russian army? Also, will the North Koreans use their own weapons that they are used to, or will they first train on Russian weapons?

24. Is it only now that the Ukrainians have started thinking about building nuclear weapons? Or are they already working on this secretly? After all, the Ukrainians have known since 2022 that Russia is a dangerous neighbour. And are the Ukrainians able to get enriched uranium or plutonium from other countries rather than from their own nuclear power plants?

25. Some kind of clown "expert" is another one)))

26. Great episode!

27. 💙

28. I have no doubt that Ukraine has the capability and know how to build nukes. As for if they could build an enriched warhead with Ukrainian material, a much easier way is to get it from Russia! With the state of Russian corruption and vast stockpile of nukes, I think obtaining it from Russia itself is entirely possible and maybe much easier than people might think.

    As a veiled threat to Putin, I think he has to take it seriously and my guess is he knows the nuclear weapons security in Russia is full of holes. There is no reason to think that the guys in the Russian military in charge of this, are any less incompetent and corrupt than any other divisions of the military! Can Putin even think that he has an accurate inventory of all warheads and material?? I can't imagine that he can comfortably and confidentially think it is all under control? I seriously doubt it. Ukraine may indeed already in possession of what it needs! I think, whether a unspoken bluff or not, it's something Putin needs to consider and if he looks into it, you can bet he will find it very much possible!

29. Ruzzia with n.korea soldiers is telling France that it's ok to send those troops they were talking about

30. Threatning to get nukes? How long would Ukraine last with North Korean level of sanctions?