The third parties % are on a third y axis not shown, but totals are shown at points.
Nice graph, immediately very intuitive and informative!
Also it’s really interesting to see those numbers. Let’s hope that trend continues for the upcoming election
It probably didn’t help that Trump said he “likes people who weren’t captured” when trying to [deny that John McCain was a war hero](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=541Cg2Jnb8s)
Thanks O’McCain for being a good person and suffering the attacks of fools.
So the 3rd Party line is confusing to me…just not on the same scale as everything else? But by how much is it off? Different amount for different years, it looks like…1992 (Perot) looks off by 41% but other years look off by 28%.
Next i would want to see a comparison of growth in D support to population growth from california. See if its shifting values or shifting population.
6 comments
Source(s):
– https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elections_in_Arizona
– https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_elections_in_Arizona
Tool: plotly.com
The third parties % are on a third y axis not shown, but totals are shown at points.
Nice graph, immediately very intuitive and informative!
Also it’s really interesting to see those numbers. Let’s hope that trend continues for the upcoming election
It probably didn’t help that Trump said he “likes people who weren’t captured” when trying to [deny that John McCain was a war hero](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=541Cg2Jnb8s)
Thanks O’McCain for being a good person and suffering the attacks of fools.
So the 3rd Party line is confusing to me…just not on the same scale as everything else? But by how much is it off? Different amount for different years, it looks like…1992 (Perot) looks off by 41% but other years look off by 28%.
Next i would want to see a comparison of growth in D support to population growth from california.
See if its shifting values or shifting population.
Comments are closed.