Putin could lose gains in Donbas as Ukraine receives new weapons | William Courtney

gains have not had strategic effect as you pointed out they’re not really significant gains so it’s not something to worry very much about and as Ukraine gets new weapons and and ammunition uh some of that could reverse itself that’s mostly taken place in the dbas area which is the area that Russia has occupied part of that area since 2014 so it’s an area where they have a stronger um infrastructure if you will to conduct attacks uh but in other areas we haven’t really seen much gain and what we have seen on the Ukrainian side is Ukraine continues to sink Russian warships in the Black Sea to the point that many or most of them now have been moved to Eastern parts of the Black Sea to avoid being destroyed by Ukrainian missiles President Vladimir zalinski of Ukraine says Russia launched a massive early morning Miss missile and drone attack on energy facilities across his country more than 50 missiles and 20 drones were used in the attack the president wrote on Twitter it marks the latest in a string of Russian attacks on Ukraine’s energy grid which Moscow insists is a legitimate military Target it comes as the EU has reached a deal to seize profits from Russia’s frozen assets to help fund weapons and aid for Ukraine within months well well William Courtney is a former Special Assistant to the US president for Russia Ukraine and Eurasia he’s also a former US ambassador to Kazakhstan and Georgia and now at the Rand Think Tank um good evening to you William hello Carol thanks so much for joining us um this really just the latest attack on energy installations in Ukraine um but it is clearly Russia flexing its muscles its military muscles and attempting to um send a message to Ukraine about the extent uh of its range uh yes and recently Russia has stepped up those attacks on energy generating and other energy infrastructure in Ukraine because Ukraine will shortly be receiving more air defense uh capability more air defense ammunition and Rockets and so the Russians appear to be trying to destroy as much of that energy infrastructure as possible before uh the anti-air capability uh knocks out Russian drones and Russian missiles and in the past uh Ukraine has actually been quite Adept at doing that um what’s your assessment of where the war has reached because there have been uh consistent reports in recent weeks about the the ground that Russian forces have been gaining not not huge dramatic gains but that they are pushing Ukraine’s forces back uh yes and that’s happened again because of the shortage of ammunition uh and also shortage of men to some extent but mainly ammunition on Ukraine side but those gains have not had strategic effect as you pointed out there not really significant gains so it’s not something to worry very much about and as Ukraine gets new weapons and and ammunition uh some of that could reverse itself that’s mostly taking place in the dbas area which is the area that Russia has occupied part of that area since 2014 so it’s an area where they have a stronger um infrastructure if you will to conduct attacks uh but in other areas we haven’t really seen much gain and what we have seen on the Ukrainian side is Ukraine continues to SN Russian warships in the Black Sea to the point that many or most of them now have been moved to Eastern parts of the Black Sea to avoid being destroyed by Ukrainian missiles we saw the um approval at long last of that uh60 billion dollar uh worth of uh military aid for Ukraine finally approved is it just a question of the fact that these supplies are taking time to reach Ukraine and do you think that they will perhaps make um quite a significant difference when they start to arrive uh they will make a difference and they’re already starting to arrive uh the US Department of Defense uh actually uh prepared uh pallets and uh shipments to go into Ukraine uh quickly but they have to be distributed uh to the Troops so that’s taking place uh now uh what has been encouraging about the Congressional vote on this is that when the aid bill came up for a vote in the house the house passed it 3 to1 margin and then the Senate it was 4 to1 margin so this is a pretty strong affirmation that the United States is in this uh for a while a good while and is supporting Ukraine uh the talk somewhere in the west that there is Ukraine fatigue in the west uh we don’t see any Ukraine fatigue here and Europe Europe is actually increasing stepping up its support including Great Britain uh for Ukraine so we don’t see evidence of Ukraine fatigue in Europe either it’s interesting you say that because we’ve also had this agreement today within the EU um on a deal to seize the profits from Russia’s frozen assets to help fund weapons and aid for Ukraine um and this appears to be um smoothing over various disputes do you think that that could be significant uh it will be helpful uh the amount is not as large as you know the $50 billion that the European Union has provided Ukraine or or pledged to provide wor of 60 billion from the US uh it will be helpful uh but the key is uh going further and seizing all of the assets and I think they’re 260 bilon or so uh in Europe that uh that can be seized uh the European Central Bank and some European Bankers have been concerned that if those assets are seized that in the future uh people around the world be will be less likely to hold Euros or use Euros as a reserve currency uh or deposit money in European Banks uh so there are some issues that are really not related to the Ukraine situation my guess is that over time those are going to be worked out the momentum is growing to use those resources to help Ukraine including to help Ukraine’s reconstruction after a major combat operations end we’ve there’s a report in um the London uh Daily Telegraph tonight that says Lord Cameron the British foreign secretary is going to call on Europe to be tougher and more assertive in the face of Russian and Chinese aggression um he’s going to be speaking at the national cyber security Center in London um saying that Britain and its allies need to adopt a harder Edge for a tougher World um and calling on Europe to spend more on defense saying that um the spending Target for NATO members should rise from 2% of GDP to 2.5% um which is in line with what the British government has committed do do you think that we do still need to see a bigger commitment to Nato from other EU Nations uh yes a larger commitment will make sense because the Russian invasion of Ukraine is a direct threat to European security at the beginning of the war there was not a strong consensus in Europe on that point but there is a very strong consensus now uh so for example Lord Cameron has pointed out that British arms provided to Ukraine can be used to strike Targets in Russia the US has not allowed that to happen for its arms but for Ukraine to be effective on the battlefield it needs to be able to strike staging areas Logistics points command and control points across the border in Russia uh So Great Britain is really leading quite well and uh We’ve also um seen one other um development on all of this um it’s been revealed that um there’s been the expulsion um of a kernel in the Russian military thrown out of um um the UK I I mean is this just part of the um the ongoing hostility between the two countries do you think um it’s hard to speculate on a specific issue I mean over the years uh hundreds uh of Russian Espionage people carrying out Espionage under diplomatic cover have been thrown out at various times uh so it’s hard to speculate about a specific case uh but the Russians are giving strong emphasis uh to using Espionage or secret agents uh if you will to carry out disinformation subd fuge activities uh in Europe and you were saying earlier that there’s no sign of uh Ukraine fatigue um but of course uh you’re in an election year in the United States uh Donald Trump has been talking about solving the Ukraine war on day one um do you think that if Donald Trump does return to the White House there will be a significant shift in policy that a trump Administration would be less willing to provide the kind of support that the Biden Administration has been doing uh to president selinski uh that’s possible uh but in our system you know Congress plays a key role Congress originates Appropriations those are originated in the house and then passed through the Senate uh so with a 3 to1 vote in the house 4 to one in the Senate uh that suggest there pretty strong support uh in Congress uh for that so I don’t expect any major change if president Trump if Donald Trump is elected president again uh but there could well be some changes William Courtney uh former Special Assistant to the US president uh for Russia Ukraine and EUR Asia are really good to speak to you tonight thank you very much for joining us you’re great welcome Carol

“Russian gains have not had strategic effect. They’re not really significant gains so its not something to worry about.”

Ukraine could “reverse” Russian gains in the Donbas area with new weapons, as they continue to to be successful in the Black Sea , says former special assistant to the president for Russia William Courtney.

📻 Listen to Times Radio – https://www.thetimes.co.uk/radio

📍 Subscribe to our channel – http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCTjDhFuGXlhx9Us0gq0VK2w?sub_confirmation=1

🗞 Subscribe to The Times https://www.thetimes.co.uk/subscribe/radio-3for3/

📲 Get the free Times Radio app https://www.thetimes.co.uk/radio/how-to-listen-to-times-radio/app

21 comments
  1. The Americans have been treacherous…Ukraine has suffered horrendous losses and destructions because the US first helped and then turned their back on Ukraine.. Never trust the USA. Mr Courtney has not apologised Slava Ukraini!

  2. What a shame that Dictators and criminals would not hold their prey in European Banks. They can always hold it in Switzerland.

  3. All the bankers and all the lawyers have said endlessly do not steal money. Russian or anyone else's. Theft is theft. The whole international banking system is based on trust.

  4. I wonder why the British in particular are so Russophobic that they float unreal scenarios.

    '“Russian gains have not had strategic effect. They’re not really significant gains so its not something to worry about.”

    Then why all this chest beating ? Why does Zelensky say unless you send me arms and money, I shall have to retreat ? Was he lying ?

    If they are not really significant gains and so its not something to worry about, why send Ukraine more money and arms like it is an emergency ?

    The Russian strategic gain is not land, it is that they have destroyed Ukraine's army and killed off its most experienced soldiers. They have broken Ukraine's morale and young men are unwilling to enlist. The Ukrainians have started to realise and think 'what is the point of me getting killed in a war at its end, when I am only a proxy warrior for the US who will abandon Ukraine at the end of the year ?'

    In 2023, the Russians hit the power distribution, in 2024, they have gone after the power production. They could have done it in 2023, but Russia has been cautious and not hit Ukraine too hard, to allow Ukraine the possibility to change course.

    'Ukraine could "reverse" Russian gains in the Donbas area with new weapons, as they continue to to be successful in the Black Sea , says former special assistant to the president for Russia William Courtney.

    From now on, Ukraine cannot reverse its losses. If the counter offensive of 2023 to regain Donbass and Crimea failed, why would it succeed in 2024, when Ukraine does not have the equipment, and most importantly it cannot raise trained manpower ?

    Checking the Black Sea fleet is an achievement, but it is a consolation, it cannot stop the Russian juggernaut. In 2022, the fortunes see-sawed with Ukraine clawing back Kherson and Kharkhov oblasts. But it changed in 2023, and Ukraine cannot regain the initiative. Even Ukrainian officials say it.

    Ukraine's position now is like Germany's position after Stalingrad. After Stalingrad, Germany never regained the capacity to attack, from then on it was trying to defend and stave off the Red Army's advance. Eventually the Red Army reached Berlin. The Ukro Nazis are on the backfoot after the failed counter offensive in 2023 and they are only fighting to stall the advance of the Russian army.

    The British need to wise up to reality : Ukraine and the west lost the war strategically in 2023, and now only the military endgame is playing out. British military intelligence lost all credibility when it issued a barrage of falsehoods like Russia ran out of missiles in 2022, that it had to scrounge microchips from washing machines, the Russians were left to fight with shovels in Bakhmut, Bakhmut was not strategic, it is only a Pyrrhic victory , Russians are poorly trained and have low morale etc.. The British come across as very undignified liars, who sabotaged negotiations to end the war, and who are cowardly and do not have the spine to send troops to Ukraine after telling Ukraine to fight on. And add to that Britain's support of Israel, and one sees a duplicitous country, aiding and abetting genocide in Palestine.

    When Russia takes Ukraine, the British will be saying it is of no strategic importance, because NATO has expanded and has two new members and so Putin is actually defeated.

  5. Putin might lose the Donbas and Crimea – I sincerely hope he does – but by creating inflated expectations videos like this only prepare the groundwork for disappointment when those hopes are not realised. Keep hopes realistic, and don't make pressure to push Ukraine into operations that it is not yet ready to carry out. That's what went wrong last year. Give them a chance to mass their new equipment at a place of their choosing, and they will succeed.

Leave a Reply