After that gender critical Compact journalist sued someone in the UK for defamation because he called her an anti-Semite, in court it came out that not only was the claim about her anti-Semitism accurate, but in discovery he was able to find instances of her admitting to being a Nazi, praising Mein Kampf, and talking about very strange neo-Nazi beliefs about “fairy races” and the like. Another of her colleagues at Compact also had his Nazi sympathies exposed in the court case. I imagine their journalist (and an editor, I believe) being exposed as Nazis in the UK was a significant part of Germany making the decision to ban this magazine for being a Nazi publication.
Kathleen Stock publicly defended the Nazi journalist after her Nazi beliefs had been publicly aired in court, and then JK Rowling (and some other gender critical personalities) publicly defended Kathleen from the resulting backlash. This tracks with JK Rowling violating German law against Holocaust denial.
2 comments
Hit dogs bark
After that gender critical Compact journalist sued someone in the UK for defamation because he called her an anti-Semite, in court it came out that not only was the claim about her anti-Semitism accurate, but in discovery he was able to find instances of her admitting to being a Nazi, praising Mein Kampf, and talking about very strange neo-Nazi beliefs about “fairy races” and the like. Another of her colleagues at Compact also had his Nazi sympathies exposed in the court case. I imagine their journalist (and an editor, I believe) being exposed as Nazis in the UK was a significant part of Germany making the decision to ban this magazine for being a Nazi publication.
Kathleen Stock publicly defended the Nazi journalist after her Nazi beliefs had been publicly aired in court, and then JK Rowling (and some other gender critical personalities) publicly defended Kathleen from the resulting backlash. This tracks with JK Rowling violating German law against Holocaust denial.