Putin cornered as UK considers long-range missiles to counter Kremlin’s nuclear threat

“They do think that Putin could use nuclear weapons.”

Defence editor at The Times, Larisa Brown, tells Times Radio’s Jo Crawford about the UK’s plans to collaborate with Germany on building long-range missiles to counter Putin’s nuclear threat.

📻 Listen to Times Radio – https://www.thetimes.co.uk/radio

📍 Subscribe to our channel – http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCTjDhFuGXlhx9Us0gq0VK2w?sub_confirmation=1

🗞 Subscribe to The Times https://www.thetimes.co.uk/subscribe/radio-3for3/

📲 Get the free Times Radio app https://www.thetimes.co.uk/radio/how-to-listen-to-times-radio/app

38 comments
  1. The problem with nuclear blackmail is where do you finally call the bluff? If Putin can get X with nuclear blackmail, then he'll move on to Y, and if that works he'll move on to Z. You might as well simply stop him at X and be done with it, and, perhaps just as importantly, discourage others from doing the same thing.

  2. China will most certainly not be part of a militatry pact with N Korea, Iran and Russia. If Russia's is relying on old Soviet era machinary and have really not made any movent of significance in eastern Ukraine I'm pretty certain that N Korea and Iran will be snuffed out in short order. China knows that their economy will hit the buffers as has Russia's. Putin is quite happy to plunge his people back into the dark ages, for his pet projects. NATO, S Korea, Australia, etc thrown into the mix!

  3. What about the attack submarines , if they follow the U.S. subs they each have 24 missiles each with 7 independant warheads each equivealent to Hiroshima ? that is over 60 per ship , if we have 3 subs that is about 180 nukes ?

  4. Vladimir Putin (and "associates " from the "Russian Mafia "/"olegarchy") Recently "neutealized" one of their own "intelligence agents"(kgb/Russian Mafia "complicit".
    I wonder what they have to hide?
    These communists always "eat themselves " Their agenda is purely "communistic".
    6****

  5. Go away uk you voted to leave the eu neither you nor the usa have any business in Europe both of you are mainly responsible for what's happening in ukraine everywhere you go you create chaos..

  6. This interview sounds like comments by a audiencen succesfully shook up by Putins nuclear threat propaganda. What the west can and can not do. While that presumed line has been crossed many times already. Under the constant threat of russia using its nuclear arms. The west should pay less attention to what putin is saying, and pay more attention to what he is doing to Ukraine. And help Ukraine accordingly! And give Ukraine the right to use their weapons as needed!

  7. At 1.30 she says in reference to the missiles with a 2,000 mile range that would be based in Germany: "so if Putin does fire a tactical nuclear weapon we would be able to resoond to that". What an incredibly ignorant thing to say. That would never happen. It would be mass suicide. Not only would it quite literally be overkill, but the response from a russian nuclear submarine somewhere off the coast of Shotland would be immediate.

  8. Another day another Times video crapping on about Putin losing. When the propaganda gas clears u will see a frozen conflict and a failed Ukrainian state. Putin or his equivalent will be fine. But you just watched 5 years of MI6 horseballs.

  9. Whats point if we don't all die in nuclear war then I'm guessing putin will be either ousted from power n killed or just dead by this time ..and hopefully russia has someone in power more friendly to diplomatic solutions rather war .. so what's point thinking so far ahead

  10. completely utterly silly, im dumbfounded how daft this is. UK can access tomahawk ground hugging cruise missile with choice of war heads and putin has been told you use nukes in ukraine then nato will destroy all Orc land foces in ukraine as radiation knows no borders, UK has trident and Orc land will never launch against UK

  11. IT WAS AN IRON DOME INTERCEPTOR MISSILE. STRIKE ….
    DUE TO INTERCEPT HEZBOLLAH’S ROCKETS
    BUT IT FAILED AND LANDED IN THE SOCCER FIELD…
    KILLING YOUNG ISRAELI'S…..
    ISRAEL QUICK TO BLAME HAMAS

  12. It's clever of the US to push Europe to create their own retaliation weapons, so that the whole exchange can be limited to the European continent.

  13. I'm afraid the whole world is cornered. Totally naive to believe the story that you will be able to wipe out Russia's and China's nuclear arsenal while they are still in the silos or on the submarines. Russia and China do not sleep while the UK and Germany manufacture and deploy these missiles. By the way, where will they find the money. Europe is at risk of deindustrialisation. It means poverty.

  14. UK has only storm shadow and Germany has the Taurus that Russia is currently jamming them in ukraine while Russia posseses multiple and various kinds of such missiles equiped with latest advanced technology which can reach britain in 7 minutes,Germany and UK are just puppy warmongers.

  15. It'll certainly be interesting to see what kind of long-range weapons we are looking at developing with Germany, since we already have the stealthy cruise missile under development with the French to replace the storm shadow and we now have hypersonics under development through aukus.

  16. News Media Outlets: ''The next World War, won't be fought by conventional means or weapons, it will be fought with Nuclear weapons and spell the end for mankind''.
    Also
    News Media outlets and Governments: ''We need to bolster our military and weapons too combat Putin and his regime, so if a wider war starts, we can beat him''.
    ?????????????????????????
    So if the next war with Putin or China will be WW3, and fought not with conventional means, but with Nuclear weapons, why bolster our standard military????
    Just make thousands more Nuclear missiles, 20 times more powerful than what we have, and point them at Russia and say ''Go on then''.
    Makes no sense.

  17. We are 🦕🦖 thanks to consecutive Governments period!
    We haven't even landed on the moon.
    🦕🦖🦕🦖🦕🦖💩

  18. This is fear mongering no one wants nuclear war otherwise its MAD, mutally assured destruction and no one wins don't believe what these people say they can spend money on war and nukes but not feeding the homeless and fund the NHS.

  19. So we’re getting a second leg to our nuclear forces. In addition to trident . We are getting land based nukes that will be based in Germany
    What warheads will go on these and what about the NPT and Germany not having nukes

    Also we have more missiles than what this lady says.
    We have tomahawk on the hunter killer subs and we have stand off missiles for the F 35

  20. Nato countries need to honor their financial commitment to NATO. They should be putting more into helping Ukraine tha th US since the threat is more proximate to them. US should not send nukes there, let the UK or France contribute the tactical nukes.

Leave a Reply