Ferran Torres vs Dani Olmo stat comparison

by No_Specific8949

6 comments
  1. Who can be our better left winger? Stats per 90 minutes

    Ferran is faster and more athletic, and has more goalscoring capabilities. imo he fits better in the fast transitions Flick wants.

    Olmo is more creative but also have greater defensive contribution and he is a better dribbler so he too has his merits. But I think the main idea is to use Olmo as our second striker (attacking midfield).

  2. It was Cesc Fábregas who said it so don’t blame me: this football based on stats makes no real sense on the field. He mentioned this when asked if Kroos was better than Iniesta. It’s all about the impact a player has on the field.

    The impact Dani Olmo had in the Euro was remarkable. For those who said NT are different than League Teams you are correct it’s just Spain NT plays similar to Barca with a majority of Catalan masia made players which includes Dani Olmo.

    Under Xavi I’d be really concerned about this signing but Flick is more flexible and uses players in a better everyone can perform better. If you saw pre season you’ll noticed Pablo Torre who would have never played like that under Xavi.

    I truest Flick will be able to obtain great performance from Dani Olmo and we all should wish the best for every Barca player in the squad

  3. As a big Ferran supporter it’s really not close, Olmo is a step above. The only thing that is a worry regarding Olmo is his injury history but overall as a player Olmo will fit us better and will offer far more

  4. All this olmo talk man just wait to see what he does on the pitch for the first 6 months then we can form a formal opinion on him.

Leave a Reply