You should make the same graph for her husband and put them side by side or overlay them.
I immediately hate any stock chart that doesn’t use a log scale.
That really doesn’t look like the best profile. Is this supposed to mean something in particular?
Looks like a fair amount of buy high and sell low. If I remember my Personal finance class, that’s not how you’re supposed to do it.
“Buy low, sell high” doesn’t seem to be the strategy.
Obviously congresspeople should not be able to trade based on insider information and its bullshit if they do, but this chart does not seem problematic? She bought and then sold at breakeven, missing the first leg of the runup. Then she bought and made a lot of money on the next two legs of the runup… but so did literally every other person who owned NVDA. Then she bought at the peak and again after it dropped a bit.
Congress needs to revive and pass the STOCK act but this chart doesn’t make any sort of case against Pelosi.
She sold and bought at the worst possible times.
Huh, I didn’t realize she was as bad at investing as I am
Btw she made less than s&p500 if she was an insider trader, she would be bad at her job.
She bought the dip, make her a wallstreetbets mod
This does not strike me as someone who has special insider knowledge on the stock market.
r/unusual_whales in shambles
Just Nancy? I bet most of Congress has a chart like this on Nvidia and a bunch of other stocks.
This isn’t suggestive of inappropriate insider info though.
There are actually two ETFs, that mimic Democrat and Republican stock trading, called NANC and KRUZ. Apparently they perform above average.
if your goal with this post was to convince me that nancy pelosi is **not** engaged in insider trading, congratulations. mission accomplished.
lol yall see one stock graph and attempt to mock the insider trading allegations.
The Pelosis have made over $30 million on technology stocks, of which Nancy is responsible for regulating. They generally vastly outperform the market, and there have multiple instances of extremely questionable trades. For example, they bought 25,000 shares two weeks before the US Army disclosed a $22 billion deal with Microsoft. The large purchase of Nvidia happened right before a vote on whether or not to provide subsidies to the industry.
Does anyone want to do this same graph with warren Buffett.
It’s interesting but yea, this isn’t convincing anyone of anything
I’m not sure what we’re supposed to acknowledge. If we should be angry that Congress owns stock then, yeah uh Congress shouldn’t own stock. If it’s to critique Nancy Pelosi’s stock strategy then anyone who is paying attention should know about Nvidia.
Her sells were at various bottoms so can’t say she had good advance knowledge
WTF is this lame post?
Bot
OK, but I still want whoever is managing her portfolio to manage mine because they’re one of the most successful traders out there.
Also, didn’t she actually go to Taiwan while holding this stock to confidentially discuss semiconductor trade? How the fuck is that not a conflict of interests?
Is this like reverse insider trading?
Naw, insider trading for politicians is all good!!!
I see she uses the same strategy that I do: buy high, sell low.
26 comments
Financial data for NVDA is from Alpaca, and I directly collected the congressional trade data from financial disclosures (https://disclosures-clerk.house.gov/FinancialDisclosure). Visualization was made in python
You should make the same graph for her husband and put them side by side or overlay them.
I immediately hate any stock chart that doesn’t use a log scale.
That really doesn’t look like the best profile. Is this supposed to mean something in particular?
Looks like a fair amount of buy high and sell low. If I remember my Personal finance class, that’s not how you’re supposed to do it.
“Buy low, sell high” doesn’t seem to be the strategy.
Obviously congresspeople should not be able to trade based on insider information and its bullshit if they do, but this chart does not seem problematic? She bought and then sold at breakeven, missing the first leg of the runup. Then she bought and made a lot of money on the next two legs of the runup… but so did literally every other person who owned NVDA. Then she bought at the peak and again after it dropped a bit.
Congress needs to revive and pass the STOCK act but this chart doesn’t make any sort of case against Pelosi.
She sold and bought at the worst possible times.
Huh, I didn’t realize she was as bad at investing as I am
Btw she made less than s&p500 if she was an insider trader, she would be bad at her job.
She bought the dip, make her a wallstreetbets mod
This does not strike me as someone who has special insider knowledge on the stock market.
r/unusual_whales in shambles
Just Nancy? I bet most of Congress has a chart like this on Nvidia and a bunch of other stocks.
This isn’t suggestive of inappropriate insider info though.
There are actually two ETFs, that mimic Democrat and Republican stock trading, called NANC and KRUZ. Apparently they perform above average.
https://www.subversiveetfs.com/kruz
https://www.subversiveetfs.com/nanc
if your goal with this post was to convince me that nancy pelosi is **not** engaged in insider trading, congratulations. mission accomplished.
lol yall see one stock graph and attempt to mock the insider trading allegations.
The Pelosis have made over $30 million on technology stocks, of which Nancy is responsible for regulating. They generally vastly outperform the market, and there have multiple instances of extremely questionable trades. For example, they bought 25,000 shares two weeks before the US Army disclosed a $22 billion deal with Microsoft. The large purchase of Nvidia happened right before a vote on whether or not to provide subsidies to the industry.
Does anyone want to do this same graph with warren Buffett.
It’s interesting but yea, this isn’t convincing anyone of anything
I’m not sure what we’re supposed to acknowledge. If we should be angry that Congress owns stock then, yeah uh Congress shouldn’t own stock. If it’s to critique Nancy Pelosi’s stock strategy then anyone who is paying attention should know about Nvidia.
Her sells were at various bottoms so can’t say she had good advance knowledge
WTF is this lame post?
Bot
OK, but I still want whoever is managing her portfolio to manage mine because they’re one of the most successful traders out there.
Also, didn’t she actually go to Taiwan while holding this stock to confidentially discuss semiconductor trade? How the fuck is that not a conflict of interests?
Is this like reverse insider trading?
Naw, insider trading for politicians is all good!!!
I see she uses the same strategy that I do: buy high, sell low.