Range of Ukraine’s ATACMS tactical ballistic missile

by UNITED24Media

15 comments
  1. Metallic Precipitation forecast is high…..and that has been your weather report. Good night.

  2. The whole intimidation method of placing airfields and military bases as close as possible to NATO really doens’t help the russians in this case, does it…

  3. Range of Ukraine’s ATACMS tactical ballistic missile **IF** USA goverment find some balls in pants and stop cry about EsCaLaTiOn

  4. The disparity is insane! I mean, when the Russians look at this, how incredibly out of touch with reality can they be to think they’re gonna win? The only thing that is preventing their complete collapse are nukes… But if they’re not actually going to push the damn button, what’s even the point anymore?

    The reality stick is smacking them in the face and their heads are spinning. Putin is finished – I wonder if he knows it yet.

  5. They should totally sneak through Poland and invade Kaliningrad, it’s just sitting there, waiting for it. Or hell, didn’t they pull the Russian Navy back? Just load up a cruise ship and send them to the Baltic Sea

  6. Target Kursk. Right in the middle of the city. Make them feel what Ukrainians feel on the daily basis.

  7. What will happen, if UAF target and hit the nearest military target in relation to Moscow?

  8. The new ATACMS have a range of 1.000 km. and hopefully Ukraine will get some of those a.s.a.p. Nobody (Germany, UK or US) have make any complaints about Ukraine using their weapons in Russia – and I assume, that some kind of approval has been received before the battle in Kursk started. When the weapons is delivered to Ukraine .. it’s basically Ukrainian weapons – and then Putler and his followers can cry a little about that.

  9. I hope that after the November election, all the long range stuff is green lighted. Ukraine would be so much safer if they could strike the airfields, ammo depots, and troop buildups 300 km into Russia.

  10. I’ve just realised they could probably hit Kaliningrad. Not saying they would, or should, just interesting that they could.

  11. Isn’t the figure a little misleading since it it comparing ATACMS missile to FAB glide bomb range? Wouldn’t it make more sense to compare ATACMS to the range of Tornado-S and ground-launched Iskander missiles (excluding naval- and air-launched cruise missiles)? Or is the point to just show which russian airfields are in range atm?

Leave a Reply