[OC] Mentions of U.S. presidents and presidential candidates on the front pages of The New York Times
September 6, 2024
[OC] Mentions of U.S. presidents and presidential candidates on the front pages of The New York Times
Posted by 33Fwjr5Nj
11 comments
I was gonna be pedantic but I’m instead going to congratulate the creator on that note about “Kamala.” It’s like they actually thought this one through…
Trump knows how to get the attention of the press. They can’t quit him.
Kudos for whoever made the Obama line tan
Why you write Kamala and Trump. It must be either Haris and Trump, or Kamala and Donald. Isn’t it?
I would love to see a similar chart from H.W. Bush’s term right before Clinton was elected.
Like, I get that Trump was still a possible candidate ever since he left office, and he was out getting indicted. But it’s kind of ridiculous that Trump enjoyed a margin of about 20 a year after he took over and it grew up until the primaries got underway. Meanwhile, Biden only had a margin of about 10 and it immediately disappeared with Trump becoming the most named once again.
That’s a disservice in journalism. Yes, Trump has made legitimate news getting indicted and running again after having lost (literally not since the 1800s). But it’s pathetic they can’t cover the Biden Administration’s accomplishments so that Americans could know about their President.
Reporters hated Trump but the newspaper accountants loved him.
It shows that the media loves to talk about Trump. Putting an article about him, how crazy or boring it is, is likely to get a ton of hits and bring in ad revenue.
I find it so annoying that male presidents are referred to by last name and then they write “Kamala.” Show some respect…it’s Harris to you!
First name basis with Harris, but all these other guys…Meh
While QUANTITY is certainly a valid measure, you’ll also need to indicate the QUALITY of the posts as FAVORABLE/UNFAVORABLE – That is where the trend is.
11 comments
I was gonna be pedantic but I’m instead going to congratulate the creator on that note about “Kamala.” It’s like they actually thought this one through…
Trump knows how to get the attention of the press. They can’t quit him.
Kudos for whoever made the Obama line tan
Why you write Kamala and Trump. It must be either Haris and Trump, or Kamala and Donald. Isn’t it?
I would love to see a similar chart from H.W. Bush’s term right before Clinton was elected.
Like, I get that Trump was still a possible candidate ever since he left office, and he was out getting indicted. But it’s kind of ridiculous that Trump enjoyed a margin of about 20 a year after he took over and it grew up until the primaries got underway. Meanwhile, Biden only had a margin of about 10 and it immediately disappeared with Trump becoming the most named once again.
That’s a disservice in journalism. Yes, Trump has made legitimate news getting indicted and running again after having lost (literally not since the 1800s). But it’s pathetic they can’t cover the Biden Administration’s accomplishments so that Americans could know about their President.
Reporters hated Trump but the newspaper accountants loved him.
It shows that the media loves to talk about Trump. Putting an article about him, how crazy or boring it is, is likely to get a ton of hits and bring in ad revenue.
I find it so annoying that male presidents are referred to by last name and then they write “Kamala.” Show some respect…it’s Harris to you!
First name basis with Harris, but all these other guys…Meh
While QUANTITY is certainly a valid measure, you’ll also need to indicate the QUALITY of the posts as FAVORABLE/UNFAVORABLE – That is where the trend is.
Biden still gets more mentions than Kamala?