A joke has to respect the context in which it is presented. You can’t be all ‘How many philosophers does it take to screw in a lightbulb? None, because this joke is set in 300 BC and there are no light bulbs yet’. Likewise, you can’t create a joke, without clarification, within a made-up context in which buying a letter in wheel of fortune reveals only one instance of the letter on the board and expect the joke will work. To defend this would be inviting narrative chaos.
Since L and R are already on the board…I’ll buy a J!
Puzzle: “What is the one thing that Donald Trump has that when he has it, it looks like a whisker, and when he loses it, it’s *by* a whisker?”
18 comments
Why not both?
L and R are already on the board.
… except that R and L were clearly chosen as “TRUMP” and “LOST” are reveled.
Can anyone on this sub take a joke? 🤣🤣🤣
L meme, having Kamela say she’ll take an L
Both are accurate
J
T_UMP
_OST
THE
E_ECTION
FIXED IT
This is quality stuff. lol
Based
One day we’ll get a Wheel of Fortune meme where the author understands the *extremely basic* rules of the game.
Kamala will be taking a fat L in November 🤣🤣🤣🥴
https://preview.redd.it/wa3kbxm7i9qd1.jpeg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=dc2b8882286c3c92bc4f2919633ad4f6cce6ff5f
A joke has to respect the context in which it is presented. You can’t be all ‘How many philosophers does it take to screw in a lightbulb? None, because this joke is set in 300 BC and there are no light bulbs yet’. Likewise, you can’t create a joke, without clarification, within a made-up context in which buying a letter in wheel of fortune reveals only one instance of the letter on the board and expect the joke will work. To defend this would be inviting narrative chaos.
Since L and R are already on the board…I’ll buy a J!
Puzzle: “What is the one thing that Donald Trump has that when he has it, it looks like a whisker, and when he loses it, it’s *by* a whisker?”
Kamala ain’t takin no L!!!