Israel verbietet UN-Generalsekretär die Einreise



Israel verbietet UN-Generalsekretär die Einreise

https://www.jpost.com/breaking-news/article-822984

41 comments
  1. >barring UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres from entering the country for his failure to “unequivocally condemn” Iran’s massive missile attack on Israel.

    Guterres is a terror supporting clown at this point honestly

  2. Guterres will claim that he had no idea Iran attacked Israel.

    The same way Lazzarini said he had no idea UNRWA employed a Hamas leader. After he was told multiple times.

  3. He wouldn’t go to Israel. He’ll stay in New York drinking wine with sheikhs and commissars after another successful day calling for ceasefire on behalf of terrorists.

  4. I don’t remember any other UN Secretary, that has been as obviously biased, irrelevant and actually damaging for UN image (if it’s even possible anymore) as this clown. At least i don’t remember one like this one from the last 30 years.

  5. Wonder, why he goes to Israel, no to Iran.  Why he do nothing regarding 101 hamas hostages  Why why

  6. I don’t think that’s wise, but I can fully understand the sentiment. Guterres repeatedly failed to condemn the terror attacks and the tactics of Hamas and Hezbollah. His neutrality is.more than doubtful.

  7. Honestly, seems fair. If Israel had done this they would be condemned.

    The un needs to keep states on side, but walking that line has gone too far into appeasement. An attack is an attack.

  8. This guy has been extremely bias since the start of the conflict. Surprised he wasn’t banned a long time ago

  9. Wars and sanctions have happened for less, wtf.

    Dint destroy the credibility of the UN so publically. Jesus the west is losing its god damn mind..

  10. You see, Israel would prefer to keep the terrorists and their sympathizers from entering Israel.

  11. Here’s the thing though. “Unequivocal” condemnation of Iran would diminish the 100+ years leading up to this moment. Nobody is innocent here, but Israel has been provocative, not just in the last few days, but for over a century in the Middle East.

    None of this is happening in isolation, and Israel is not simply an innocent victim of an unprovoked attack.

    None of this is to say that attacking civilians is acceptable, but that understanding the true state of things requires a critical analysis of history, not just “Iran bad Israel good”.

  12. Good for Israel. The UN Sec. General is fully complicit in his knowledge of Hamas and UNWRA. Moreover, he didn’t condemn Iran’s “show of force attack.”

    That man is the ultimate fence sitter on most things, but when it comes to Israel, it’s obvious he is biased against them. It’s truly ridiculous.

  13. Now why would Israel allow an openly hostile Iranian junior ayatollah into the country?

  14. > “A Secretary-General who gives backing to terrorists, rapists, and murderers from Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthis, and now Iran—the mothership of global terror—will be remembered as a stain on the history of the UN.” [Said Israeli Foreign Minister Israel Katz]

    A stain on the history of the UN? It’d be like picking out a stain on a toddler’s lunch bib.

  15. Israel didn’t bar Guterres from entering the country. Israel Katz claims to have done so. Does he actually have the power to do so in his role as FM?

    (This is not a comment on Guterres.)

  16. A reminder that both [Ban Ki-Moon](https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/ban-kimoon-united-nations-disproportionate-israel-focus-resolutions-palestinians-human-rights-danny-danon-a7481961.html) and [Kofi Annan](https://www.nytimes.com/1999/12/13/world/annan-calls-for-better-treatment-of-israel-at-united-nations.html), the last two UN secretary generals have repeatedly stated themselves that the UN is biased against Israel, mostly after leaving office. Guterres is a pure product of that 20-year running obsession with condemning Israel.

  17. Absolutely insane. Israel keeps sliding closer and closer to the deep end, and they seem happy to do so

  18. well, it’s not like Israel’s decision happened in a vacuum… (where have I heard that phrase before guterres?)

    Guterres has constantly dismissed the attacks Israel has suffered this past year, attack that originated from Iran and their terrorist lapdogs – Hamas, Hezbolla, Houhis, and Iran itself.

  19. All UN does for years is telling how concerned it is about one thing or another. The more given country is paying to UN, the more they concerned about its well-being. Beside not condeming Iran, they absolutely ok about russias membership, which is a complete joke.

    Useless org by all standards.

  20. Remember what happened to Japan after it withdrew from the League of Nations. Any country that decides to refuse dialogue with the United Nations is making a mistake.

Leave a Reply