By Richard Palmer

Posted by ButIDigress79

5 comments
  1. I agree it’s stupid to think Zara , Eug and Bea would give up their royal adjacent roles to become working royals. In their current scenario not only can they have their brand partnerships and sponsors , they can also portray themselves being close to Working royals which only benefits their brand. Becoming a working royal is going to disrupt their lavish lifestyle and freedom.

  2. Why are people using the phrase “royal adjacent”? I’ve never heard that term. In the UK they would say, “members of the royal family” or “non-working royals” etc.

  3. They would never be working Royals because 1) they are not Royals and 2) Mike Tindall has a bad reputation that leads into the room before him.

    And for the people who insist that Mike Tindall doesn’t have a bad reputation, he has been caught by paparazzi pawing women who are not Zara, one shortly after they got married and most recently the crew member of the reality show he was on. Not to mention that vile dwarf tossing crap.

Leave a Reply