CConflicts

Intel Update – October 19 – Paperwork and Drones

  • October 20, 2024



Intel Update – October 19 – Paperwork and Drones

DoD Directive 5240.01 (2007 version) – https://dodsioo.defense.gov/Portals/46/DoDD5240.01thru2014p.pdf
DoD Directive 5240.01 (2024 version) – https://www.esd.whs.mil/portals/54/documents/dd/issuances/dodd/524001p.pdf
DoD Manual 5240.01 (2016 version) – https://dodsioo.defense.gov/Portals/46/DoDM%20%205240.01.pdf
EO 12333 – https://dodsioo.defense.gov/Library/EO-12333/
Joint Publication 3-28 – https://www.jcs.mil/portals/36/documents/doctrine/pubs/jp3_28.pdf
DoD Directive 5210.56 – https://irp.fas.org/doddir/dod/d5210_56.pdf

00:00 – The Paperwork
33:00 – Helene Recovery
39:55 – Southwest Region
41:02 – Western Region
41:49 – Far East
43:27 – GhostNet Reports

The text version of the Wire can be found on Twitter: https://twitter.com/s2_underground
And on our Wire Telegram page here: https://t.me/S2undergroundWire

If you would like to support us, we’re on Patreon!
https://www.patreon.com/user?u=30479515

And if you don’t like Patreon, we’re also on Playeur!
https://playeur.com/c/S2Underground

Disclaimer:
No company sponsored this video. In fact, we have ZERO sponsors. We are funded 100% by you, the viewer. All of our funding comes from direct support from platforms like Patreon, or from ad revenue on YouTube. Please note that even though it hurts our income, we still offer ad-free watching via alternative platforms like Odysee, Gab, and (for now) Rumble.

Odysee: https://odysee.com/@S2Underground:7
Gab: https://gab.com/S2underground
Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/theunderground
BitChute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/P2NMGFdt3gf3/

Just a few reminders for everyone who’s just become aware of us, in order to keep these briefings from being several hours long, I can’t cover everything. I’m probably covering 1% of the world events when we conduct these briefings, so please remember that if I left it out, it doesn’t necessarily mean that it’s unimportant. Also, remember that I do these briefings quite often, so I might have covered an issue previously that you might not see if you are only watching our most recent videos. I’m also doing this in my spare time, so again I fully admit that these briefings aren’t even close to being perfect; I’m going for a healthy blend of speed and quality. If I were to wait and only post a brief when it’s “perfect” I would never post anything at all. So expect some minor errors here and there. If there is a major error or correction that needs to be made, I will post it here in the description, and verbally address it in the next briefing. Also, thanks for reading this far. It is always surprising the number of people that don’t actually read the description box to find more information.

This content is purely educational and does not advocate for violating any laws. Do not violate any laws or regulations. This is not legal advice. Consult with your attorney.

Our Reading List!
https://www.goodreads.com/user/show/133747963-s2-actual

The War Kitchen Channel!
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCYmtpjXT22tAWGIlg_xDDPA

42 comments

  1. Oh have plenty watching, not many liking. I like the post when I remember, but at the start of each video if you ask to like before listening, people won’t forget and you’ll be able to reach out this great information to more people.
    Either way, keep up the good work,I appreciate you and what you do

  12. I would appreciate it if you could speak on P.E.A.D.s. (Presidential Emergency Action Documents) I know most, if not all, are classified. But, I'd like to hear about it from the Intel side.

  13. I was thinking that maybe they added the killing citizens in the favor of American citizens. Like when troops were deployed during the GF riots? It’s still not good. But just wondering

  17. My guy, you are arguning semantics here. All this does is create an idea of legality to place in the minds of young soldiers to justify use of deadly military force on civilians. Sometimes you are too much of a pollanna on things. When you get older, if they let you, you will likely become more pragmatic about government.

  20. people need to stop respecting cops and soldiers. These people are not heroes and are nothing bur order followers. They are also now threats to your survival as a citizen.

  22. So posse comitatus has never been in effect for our government and they have always scoffed at the law, intending to have the army shoot Americans whenever the DoD chose to do so? No law or constitution applies to them? Seems to be so, but they are usually more circumspect about it.

  23. I don't care about ROE. On American soil, we all live under one set. Anyone has the right to defend themselves and others from an immediate violent threat and that's about where it ends. What does and doesn't count as a threat is beyond my pay grade, but I don't have an issue with soldiers defending themselves and others. Detention and roadblocks and surveillance and crap are where they start to cross the line

  25. If this had been on the coast the SEABEE's would have been there. The east coast Naval Construction Battalion Center is in Gulfport, Mississippi.
    This is the current administration holding these resources back.

  29. This reminds me of the military police field manual. The 1976 version went without update until around 2001, and when it was updated the number of pages quadrupled. What I read in the updated manual was very disturbing, because I've been familiar with the language. The meaning of words (and phrases) is VERY important!

  30. I agree about drones and don't forget that the Obama admin (AG Eric Holder) REFUSED to take drone strikes on US citizens ON US SOIL "off the table" when pressed by Senator Rand Paul.
    Edit: Holder's letter to Senator Paul was written March 4, 2013.

  34. They let the border open to set the stage for a f flag. Therein justifying this shit, to actually target us. Gonna take balls to join a “neighborhood watch” when you hear they’re dronestriking members of said “neighborhood watch”

  38. The Patriot Act did it first. It had multiple lines claiming "this does not change existing U.S. law" regarding the military's stance toward U.S. citizens. That seemed suspicious to me, so I read the entire document. Long story short, there was a line which cryptically referred to a law from the 1980s which itself cryptically referred to a law from the 1950s. All the patriot act did was change the context of the 1950s law: rather than requiring preauthorization, the president now had 30 days to seek authorization after acting.
    Hence how Trump legally drone struck the Iranian general. And um, the law explicitly streamlined same for U.S. citizens via the 1950s law. Which is why it said it didn't change existing law…

  39. Used to be, when flying a drone for the military in the US, even on 10 orders, you could not track a specific individual without a direct order from the DNI. That's why we could tell the Col, "No, we're not going to fly over your troops and watch the portapotties with the thermal to make sure no funny business is going on in there, you need a direct order from the DNI to do that." Now, just like when 3 let agents do raids, and merely "assisting local authorities in xyz, based on years of investigation by ghj". E. G. If it's not covered by federal law as specifically allocated to that agency, local authorities have the enforcement powers. Not them. Even when the whole thing was that assisting agency's idea. That did, whether right or wrong, previously allow lethal, just like if the sheriff pulled his firearm, or strapping a kablow to a EOD bot to take out a perp that is an active threat (happened). My guess is this allows a whole lot of shenanigans while tasked with "assisting local authorities" who are allowed to do all kinds of things if their policy let's them. Definitely Intel. All you soldiers near bases, better watch out, Col has an in with the local base town's sheriff, and with this new directive, he's gonna get UAS units tasked under him so he can finally make a recording of your portapotty tomfoolery. Or any of that sinister stuff too I guess.

  40. In the Madison Riots and the subsequent Kyle Rittenhouse trial proved that the FBI was running drones at these events. It was in fact FBI drone footage that was exculpatory. So the Feds are already routinely running drone surveillance.

  41. Hell, some of those "threats" the feds are so "worried" about are there own people, if we take some of the comments from folks like Dirty Civilian at face value. ( Some "methheads with guns" turned out to be 5th Group guys out help with the humanitarian efforts.)

Leave a Reply